Imagine Copernicus, Newton, Pasteur “Marching for Science”

first_img Recommended Requesting a (Partial) Retraction from Darrel Falk and BioLogos Jane Goodall Meets the God Hypothesis Email Print Google+ Linkedin Twitter Share Congratulations to Science Magazine for an Honest Portrayal of Darwin’s Descent of Man TagsAlfred WegnerEstoniaExpelledFacebookFinlandHelsinkiHeretic: One Scientist’s Journey from Darwin to DesignIsaac NewtonJonathan WittLouis PasteurMarch for ScienceMatti LeisolaNicolaus Copernicussciencesocial mediaTallinnThe Structure of Scientific RevolutionsThomas KuhnTwitterWashington DC,Trending Saturday’s March for Science, like last year’s original, promises to be an exercise in self-congratulation and virtue signaling. That, and a loud and sustained demand for conformity. Our colleague and Heretic co-author Jonathan Witt observes over at The Stream:Study the Facebook and Twitter feeds on the event. What you’ll see is a grab bag of public policy issues. Some of those issues are ones reasonable people, including scientists, disagree on. But in the M4S subculture, dissent is a thought crime.You see, the march isn’t mainly about science. It’s about marching — row upon row of obedient soldiers keeping lock-step time.This is why the march’s social media feeds are marked by an atmosphere of smug insularity. “There is No Alternative to Scientific Facts,” a protestor’s sign reads in one photo there. But who beyond a tiny fraction of people wants to throw overboard all or even most scientific facts?No, the debate is about what is and what isn’t an established scientific fact. It’s over what to make of those facts. It’s over which facts point to problems that merit public resources. It’s over which policy proposals best address those problems.And notice, those policy questions aren’t themselves questions of natural science. They’re questions of public policy and economics. Alas, the M4S drumbeaters routinely conflate these questions with science — which isn’t very scientific of them.The word “abuse” gets tossed around a bit too freely today, but what this is, really, is an abuse of science’s good name toward other purposes.Dr. Witt poses a great question. Imagine any of the great scientists of the past “Marching for Science.”Think about it. Thank goodness Copernicus had the courage not to stay in line and march. Thank goodness Newton didn’t scurry back into line when critics said his theory of gravity was “spooky action at a distance.” Thank goodness Louis Pasteur didn’t stay in line and support the mainstream scientific view that life could spontaneously generate from non-life. And thank goodness Alfred Wegner broke ranks and insisted the continents were not fixed but drift.Each of these scientists was ridiculed but later vindicated. Their willingness to break ranks and question the “scientific consensus” was key to scientific progress…Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions highlighted what is today a truism among historians of science: Reigning scientific paradigms, challenged by new and contrary evidence, do not go gently. Most scientists who invest their careers in a paradigm find it hard to admit the mistake. So scientific revolutions often happen very slowly, and only after brave scientists break ranks and wage a long campaign, risking the ire of their colleagues. (See the film Expelled for examples of the ire.)Right. Go ahead and picture Copernicus, Newton, Pasteur out there on the Mall in Washington, DC, or at numerous worldwide satellite locations, this weekend. For that matter, visualize bioengineer Matti Leisola, a super-productive scientist himself who co-wrote Heretic with Jonathan Witt and whose story the book tells, hefting a protest sign that reads “SCIENCE ROCKS” or something similar.Can’t do it? Neither can I. Maybe that’s because the March is about many things, but not so much about Science. Real scientists would have better things to do.Update: I just checked — sadly, there is no satellite March for Science planned in Finland. Dr. Leisola, in the unlikely event he had the free time to go and march, would have to make his way from Helsinki across the Gulf of Finland to Tallinn, Estonia, in order to participate.Photo: March for Science, 2017, Brisbane, by interestedbystandr, via Flickr. Free Speech Imagine Copernicus, Newton, Pasteur “Marching for Science”David [email protected]_klinghofferApril 13, 2018, 12:28 PM Share Email Print Google+ Linkedin Twitter Share Origin of Life: Brian Miller Distills a Debate Between Dave Farina and James Tour “A Summary of the Evidence for Intelligent Design”: The Study Guide A Physician Describes How Behe Changed His MindLife’s Origin — A “Mystery” Made AccessibleCodes Are Not Products of PhysicsIxnay on the Ambriancay PlosionexhayDesign Triangulation: My Thanksgiving Gift to Alllast_img read more

DEATH NOTICES: June 9, 2020

first_img Emily Claire Provost Broussard Dobbs, 87, of Groves passed away on Saturday, June 6, 2020 at Holland Place in Nederland, Clayton Thompson Funeral Home in Groves.Barbara Howard Battle, 87, of Bridge City passed away on Friday, June 5, 2020 at Medical Center of Southeast Texas, Clayton Thompson Funeral Home in Groves.Mable Milliet, 98, of Huntsville, formerly of Groves, passed away on Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at Huntsville Memorial Hospital, Clayton Thompson Funeral Home in Groves. Elizabeth Pitts, 67, of Port Arthur died Friday, June 5, 2020. Funeral arrangements are pending at Gabriel Funeral Home.Doris Samuel, 86, of Beaumont, TX died Friday, June 5, 2020. Funeral arrangements are pending at Gabriel Funeral Home.Colon Isadore, Sr., 89, of Port Arthur died Sunday, June 7, 2020. Funeral arrangements are pending at Gabriel Funeral Home.Eula M. Touchet, 96, of Winnie, died Monday, June 8, 2020, Broussard’s, Nederland. Marvin James Lemoine, Sr., 93, of Bridge City, Texas passed away June 8, 2020. Services are under the direction of Melancon’s Funeral Home in Nederland.Camille “C. J.” Bourg, 75, of Port Neches, Texas passed away June 4, 2020. Services are under the direction of Melancon’s Funeral Home in Nederland.Mark Ray Broussard, 66, of Port Arthur, Texas passed away on Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at the Medical Center of Southeast Texas, Clayton Thompson Funeral Home in Groves.center_img Bradford Guillory, 33, of Houston, TX died Monday, June 1, 2020. Funeral arrangements are pending at Gabriel Funeral Home.James Ray Towers, 66, of Port Arthur died Tuesday, June 2, 2020. Funeral arrangements are pending at Gabriel Funeral Home.Alethea Lewis, 39, of Port Arthur died Tuesday, June 2, 2020. Funeral arrangements are pending at Gabriel Funeral Home.Mattie Champagne, 75, of Nederland died Friday, June 5, 2020. Funeral arrangements are pending at Gabriel Funeral Home.last_img read more