WhatsApp Loganair’s new Derry – Liverpool air service takes off from CODA Pinterest Nine til Noon Show – Listen back to Monday’s Programme Previous articleDisgust after human excrement found dumped in west DonegalNext article‘Stigma’ preventing people getting tested for Covid-19 News Highland Community Enhancement Programme open for applications Google+ Arranmore progress and potential flagged as population grows Warning many Donegal businesses may not survive the winter Twitter WhatsApp AudioHomepage BannerNews Google+ A Donegal County Councillor and Hotelier says there needs to be a radical change in how the Government is helping the tourism industry through the crisis. Cllr Michael Naughton is warning many businesses in Donegal won’t survive the winter unless the VAT and commercial rates are tackled while more funding packages are also needed to keep them afloat.Over 7,500 jobs in Donegal depend on the tourism industry.Cllr Naughton says businesses which are currently open will not make money in July and August and there needs to be more forward thinking:Audio Playerhttps://www.highlandradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/naughdfgdfgdftontourism1pm.mp300:0000:0000:00Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume. Facebook RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Important message for people attending LUH’s INR clinic Facebook Twitter Pinterest By News Highland – July 21, 2020 Publicans in Republic watching closely as North reopens further
A new rent law is causing confusion (Credit: iStock)Conflicting interpretations of a few lines of the new rent law is leading to widespread panic, with some landlords rushing to re-issue leases and others throwing caution to the wind and risking potential overcharge proceedings.Real estate attorneys and tenant attorneys are at odds over how to interpret a key section of the new rent law: raising preferential rents to legal rents for lease renewal offers provided to tenants before June 14 on leases that are effective after the changes were signed into law.Landlord attorneys say ambiguity in the law could mean landlords are stuck with the preferential rents on the 270,000 preferential rent leases in NYC in 2018, according to data from HCR provided by the RGB to The Real Deal. In 2017, Department of Homes and Community Renewal reported that the average preferential rent in Queens was $1,611.Without guidance from the state agency that oversees rent regulated housing, some landlords are rushing to re-issue renewal offers for leases that go into effect after June 14, in light of stricter guidelines for overcharges. Sherwin Belkin, of law firm Belkin, Burden Wenig and Goldman, said that the legislature showed a “lack of understanding” of rental property management by making the law take effect immediately.“These are very uncertain times. Until some of this shakes out, by either court decision or some guidance from the division of housing, my rule is be safe not sorry. We’re advising owners to re-issue renewal offers if the lease takes effect after June 14. To be safe they should use the preferential rent.”Other landlords are digging their heels in, saying that since renewal offers provided before June 14 were proper, the new rules should only apply to new renewal offers going forward.TRD reviewed copies of leases from two tenants who say their landlord, LeFrak, is trying to skate the new rules and jack up their preferential rents. One LeFrak City tenant, who spoke on condition of anonymity, had a preferential rent of $2,296 on their June and July lease statements, and received a lease renewal offer in April for a new legal rent of $2,693 for a two-year lease — a 17% increase— which would go into effect on July 19. Another LeFrak City tenant, who spoke on condition of anonymity, received a renewal offer in July that showed an increase larger than the 1.5% or 2.5% that the Rent Guidelines Board instituted in June.“In accordance with DHCR regulations, rent-stabilized lease renewal offers are prepared and distributed no less than 90 and no more than 150 days prior to lease expiration. Any June or July renewal offer was prepared as required well in advance of the passage of the new rent laws and followed the regulations in effect at the time the notice of renewal was sent,” a spokesperson for LeFrak said.The spokesperson also noted that while they cannot comment on specific leases, they would meet with any residents to answer questions about renewal leases.Even leases with renewal offers made prior to June 14th should adhere to the new framework, a spokesperson from Homes and Community Renewal said in a statement to TRD after this article was published.“For tenants with preferential rents and who have a renewal lease with an occupancy date on or after June 14th, the new law applies,” said Brian Butry, a spokesperson.Blaine Schwadel, from real estate law firm Rosenberg & Estis, said that after conversations about the new law, he and his colleagues are still unsure about how to interpret the new rule. That leaves it up to landlords to either raise preferential rents to legal rents and take the risk of potential treble charges down the road, or toe the line to the new rules.“I know some owners are taking the position that since they were required to send out the offers before the rent laws changed, and it was sent during the appropriate window, under the old law, it was timely, proper, and that’s the position the owner will take. So I don’t know how it’s going to turn out.”The law says that any tenant who is “subject to a lease on or after the effective date” or “is or was entitled to receive a renewal or vacancy lease on or after such date” must be charged the preferential rent. That language, said Ellen Davidson, a staff attorney at Legal Aid Society, is extremely clear.“The law is very clear that if you have a renewal lease that goes into effect after June 14, it must be based on the pref[erential] rent and any increases from Rent Guidelines Board have to be on the preferential rent,” Davidson said. “And it’s true that the law rewrote the contracts— just like the change in the law in 2003 completely rewrote every preferential lease retroactively.”Editor’s note: This article was updated on Friday, July 19 at 2:29 p.m. to include a statement from DHCR. This content is for subscribers only.Subscribe Now
BERLIN – Police say a man living in Germany was shot in the back of his head, but that it took him five years to realize it. Police said Tuesday that the 35-year-old man was hit by a .22-caliber bullet in the western town of Herne as he was out in the street partying and drunk on New Year’s Eve five years ago.They say the man recalled receiving a blow to the head, but told them he didn’t seek medical assistance at the time.The bullet did not penetrate the skull, and police say the Polish man only went to see a doctor recently when he felt a lump on the back of his head. An X-ray showed an object under his skin, and doctors operated and found the projectile.Police say it may have been a stray bullet fired by a reveler in celebration.