France Christmas Market Attack: Terrorism Travel Insurance Can Cover Travelers

first_imgST. PETERSBURG, Fla. December 13, 2018 — On Wednesday, December 11, 2018, a shooting at France’s largest Christmas market has left at least three dead and been declared an act of terrorism. With the gunman still on the loose and the country reeling from the recent riots in Paris, travelers may be concerned about their upcoming trips. Fortunately, most travel insurance policies include cancellation coverage for terrorist attacks, as long as specific conditions are met. Travel insurance comparison site, Squaremouth, explains what travelers need to know now about coverage related to this shooting and possible future attacks. If You Do Have Travel InsuranceTravelers with an upcoming trip to France may be eligible to cancel if their policy includes Trip Cancellation coverage for terrorism. In order to qualify for this benefit, policies must meet some or all of the following requirements:The traveler’s trip departure date must be within 7-30 days of the Christmas market attack on December 11thThe traveler’s itinerary must include Strasbourg or an area within 50-100 miles of the cityTravelers currently in Strasbourg can be covered to cut their trip short and return home early if their policy includes Trip Interruption coverage for terrorism.Travelers experiencing delays due to the attack and subsequent transportation shutdown may also have coverage under the Travel Delay benefit.Travel Delay reimburses additional expenses such as meals and accommodations if travelers experience an unexpected transportation delay for 3-12 hours, depending on the policy requirements. If You Do Not Currently Have Travel InsuranceUninsured travelers that no longer wish to go on a scheduled trip to France due to the Christmas market attack can no longer purchase a policy with coverage to cancel due to this specific event.Travelers who are concerned about future attacks in France or other destinations can still buy a policy to include Trip Cancellation coverage for terrorism.Squaremouth recommends that travelers specifically concerned with canceling a trip due to a terrorist attack review their policy specifics, as some policies may not cover a terrorist attack if a previous terrorist attack has occurred in the same city within the past 90 days. Squaremouth launched the France Christmas Market Attack Travel Insurance Information Center to keep travelers up-to-date with coverage for this event. This resource will be regularly updated by Squaremouth’s travel insurance experts as information becomes available.  About SquaremouthSquaremouth compares travel insurance products from every major travel insurance provider in the United States. Using Squaremouth’s comparison engine and third-party customer reviews, travelers can research and compare insurance products side-by-side. More information can be found at read more

Judiciary condemns PMs statement that judges action smacks of vendetta

Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)RelatedGovt attacks on Chancellor ‘unprecedented in its savagery’ – RamkarranJanuary 23, 2017In “latest news”Private Sector concerned about Govt’s “repeated” refusal to pay DipconJuly 10, 2019In “Business”AG denies attacking Chancellor, threatens media for reportingFebruary 4, 2017In “latest news” The Supreme Court of Judicature has condemned statements published in the State-owned Guyana Chronicle attributed to Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo who was quoted as saying that “…the judge’s action smacks of vendetta.”The Prime Minister, according to the article, was referring to Justice Priya Sewnarine-Beharry’s order that Finance Minister Winston Jordan pay Dipcon by July 8, 2019 or be jailed for 21 days.See full statement below:The Judiciary has noted with grave concern an article in the today’s Guyana Chronicle Newspaper captioned “’We have a right to protect taxpayers’ money’ – AG flays ‘PSC’s hypocritical’ stance on Dipcon matter… PM says judge’s action smacks of vendetta” in which aspersions are cast on the judiciary in relation to a matter before the Court.The independence of the Judiciary and the rule of law must be maintained at all times.The Judiciary would like to emphasize that anyone who is dissatisfied with a judgment or a decision of a court has a right of appeal, and this is the avenue by which a lawful challenge to any judgment or decision can be made.The Judiciary once again reaffirms its independence and integrity. ENDThe Guyana Chronicle has since apologised and changed the article in its online version to say that the Prime Minister described the court action against Jordan, not the decision of the judge, as “vendetta”. read more